Six-node directory

Place your Cloud Mac on the right network path

Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong, the US East, and US West each offer three tiers of dedicated Apple Silicon physical nodes. Narrow your options by team, repository, and dependency location, then test with real workloads. Directory combinations are generally available to order; confirm live availability in the console.

3 tiers · 6 nodes · Dedicated physical machines · No virtualization · USD billing

Node overview

Six nodes for six network starting points

Node names indicate optional regional delivery locations and do not guarantee fixed latency. Every node includes VPSGit M4 Core, VPSGit M4 Plus, and VPSGit M4 Pro configurations.

Southeast Asia

Singapore

A strong fit for workflows with team members, artifact storage, and business dependencies across Southeast Asia, and a candidate starting point for collaboration across Asia.

Node code
SG
Configurations
3 tiers
East Asia

Japan (Tokyo)

A strong fit for development work centered on repositories, package mirrors, or team collaboration in Japan and nearby regions, with local remote desktop performance worth evaluating.

Node code
JP
Configurations
3 tiers
Northeast Asia

South Korea (Seoul)

A strong fit for teams with developers, repository services, or collaborators in South Korea and Northeast Asia. Focus on dependency downloads and interaction stability.

Node code
KR
Configurations
3 tiers
South China & Southeast Asia

Hong Kong

A strong fit for development workflows connecting teams in South China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia. Evaluate remote desktops, asset transfers, and regional dependencies.

Node code
HK
Configurations
3 tiers
Eastern North America & Western Europe

US East

A strong fit for build and automation workloads whose repositories, artifact platforms, team members, or end-user services are concentrated in Eastern North America and Western Europe.

Node code
US-E
Configurations
3 tiers
Western North America

US West

A strong fit for West Coast teams, regional repositories, and service dependencies, and a US-side candidate for collaboration with Asia-Pacific teams.

Node code
US-W
Configurations
3 tiers
How to choose

Map the complete workflow, not just geographic distance

A single build may traverse the developer network, code repository, package mirror, artifact storage, and final test environment. The best node makes the critical path more reliable—not necessarily the one closest on a map.

01 Developer location

Remote desktops and interactive debugging are more sensitive to round-trip latency and jitter. Start by testing a node near primary operators, then check stability during peak hours.

02 Code repository location

Frequent pulls of large repositories, submodules, or large files can directly affect job startup time. Compare full clones with incremental pulls rather than testing only the homepage response.

03 Dependency sources

Validate Swift Package Manager, Homebrew, RubyGems, npm, and private caches separately. If critical dependencies are concentrated in one region, prioritize proximity to them.

04 Team time zones

Multiregional teams should identify who operates during each handoff window and who handles failed jobs. Choose a node that works well for both shifts.

05 End-user location

If the Cloud Mac also serves previews, tests, or lightweight inference APIs, consider where results are consumed and include the return path in testing.

Machine and node matrix

Three tiers across all six nodes

The table shows the current directory relationship. All listed combinations are marked available; actual availability is returned live by the console when you place an order.

VPSGit Cloud Mac configuration availability across six nodes
Configuration Singapore Japan (Tokyo) South Korea (Seoul) Hong Kong US East US West
VPSGit M4 Core M4 · 16GB · 256GB Available Available Available Available Available Available
VPSGit M4 Plus M4 · 24GB · 512GB Available Available Available Available Available Available
VPSGit M4 Pro M4 Pro · 64GB · 2TB Available Available Available Available Available Available
Asia-Pacific nodes

Four Asia-Pacific gateways for different collaboration hubs

Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong, US East, and US West support builds, inference, media processing, and remote collaboration. The main difference is the actual path between operators and external services.

SG

Singapore: Southeast Asian collaboration and regional dependencies

When developers, object storage, package mirrors, or business test environments are concentrated in Southeast Asia, Singapore is often worth prioritizing. Remote desktop teams should check input response during normal work hours, while CI teams should track full dependency restoration, cache hits, and artifact upload times.

  • Best for Southeast Asian development and cross-region collaboration
  • Test package mirrors, artifact storage, and return paths
  • Do not replace sustained observation with a single latency result
JP

Tokyo: Japanese teams and East Asian repositories

When primary operators, code repositories, or test services are in Japan, Tokyo can reduce cross-region hops in the workflow. For frequent GUI use, test keyboard and mouse response, screen updates, and large-file transfers—not just SSH connectivity.

  • Best for Japan-based teams and East Asian collaboration
  • Test repository pulls and interactive debugging
  • Repeat jitter and packet-loss tests during peak hours
KR

Seoul: Northeast Asian development and automation

Seoul suits workflows whose primary members or external dependencies are in South Korea and Northeast Asia. Self-hosted Runners should execute representative jobs covering dependency installation, compilation, testing, and artifact uploads, with each stage recorded.

  • Best for Korean teams and Northeast Asian paths
  • Test Runner queues and cache restoration
  • Compare incremental and cold-start builds
HK

Hong Kong: Collaboration across South China and Southeast Asia

Hong Kong can serve as a candidate handoff point for teams in South China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia. Media workflows should test proxy asset sync, timeline operations, and export transfers; development workflows should verify that repositories, dependencies, and test services follow a sensible path.

  • Best for South China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia
  • Test remote desktops and asset transfers
  • Validate separately for each actual network provider
US nodes

Choose US East or US West by dependency direction

US nodes are not split into additional cities. Choose based on the main distribution of repositories, CI services, team members, and end users rather than office address alone.

US-E Eastern North America & Western Europe

US East

A strong fit for tasks involving repositories, artifact services, team members, or test targets in Eastern North America and Western Europe. For CI, compare cold-cache pulls, concurrent job startup, and artifact uploads; for remote collaboration, cover core work and handoff hours.

Prioritize
Repository pulls, artifact uploads, transatlantic collaboration
Good for validating
Xcode builds, automated tests, team workstations
Avoid assuming
Geographic proximity does not mean every dependency path is shorter
US-W Western North America

US West

A strong fit for West Coast teams, regional repositories, and service dependencies, and for US-side workflows connecting to Asia-Pacific collaborators. Measure operator-to-node, node-to-repository, and node-to-artifact-storage paths separately rather than averaging them together.

Prioritize
West Coast interaction, repository access, Asia-Pacific handoffs
Good for validating
CI Runners, MLX inference, remote production
Avoid assuming
One fast speed test does not represent long-running job stability
Test before ordering

Compare candidate nodes with the same workload sample

Tests should be repeatable, recorded, and cover the operations you actually care about. Keep command output, job timing by stage, and experience notes so the team can evaluate results together.

01 Basic path testing

From your primary office network, record round-trip latency, packet loss, and route changes. Cover both normal work hours and peak periods; do not conclude from a single minimum value.

02 Jitter monitoring

Monitor latency variation over time and watch for intermittent pauses in remote desktop input. When average latency is similar, the steadier path is usually better for interactive work.

03 Remote desktop evaluation

Perform window switching, code editing, simulator operations, and file drag-and-drop. Record screen updates, input response, and stability during sustained use.

04 CI dependency validation

Run cold-start and cache-hit jobs on a representative repository, recording repository pulls, dependency restoration, compilation, testing, and artifact uploads separately.

Consistent regional information

One decision structure across six regional entry points

Every node page uses the same fields, changing only regional facts, recommended scenarios, and preselected order parameters. This makes nodes directly comparable without losing key criteria to different page structures.

A

Regional facts

Clearly state the node name, coverage direction, available configurations, and paths worth validating. Do not add cities outside the directory or promise fixed network latency.

B

Recommended scenarios

Explain fit based on developer location, repositories, dependencies, team time zones, and end users instead of replacing real testing with generic labels.

C

Preselected order

A regional entry point only carries the selected node into configuration. The user still confirms the configuration, term, and add-ons; live availability comes from the console.

SGSingaporeRegional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
JPJapan (Tokyo)Regional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
KRSouth Korea (Seoul)Regional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
HKHong KongRegional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
US-EUS EastRegional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
US-WUS WestRegional facts + recommended scenarios + node preselection
Cross-region migration

Migration is a new delivery, not an instant switch

Moving between nodes requires reconfirming target availability, scheduling data transfer, and updating access controls and automation. Reserve time for validation and rollback before migrating.

01 Recheck the directory and availability

Confirm that the target node supports your current configuration and add-ons, then use the console’s live result to schedule delivery of the new node.

02 Schedule data transfer

Inventory repositories, caches, models, assets, build artifacts, and service configuration. Prefer restoring from independent backups and verify file integrity.

03 Update access policies

Adjust SSH host records, firewall allowlists, Runner labels, artifact upload targets, and team handoff documentation. Revoke access to the old node.

04 Validate in parallel, then finalize

Before the old term ends, test builds, connections, dependency downloads, and result transfers. Complete the switch only after confirming the new node meets requirements.

Start configuring

Choose a node, then confirm configuration and term

All three dedicated Apple Silicon physical node tiers are available across six regions. In configuration, choose the machine, a daily-to-quarterly term, and add-ons. Confirm live availability in the console.